PASSING A LEGEND
As Al Michaels said last night on NBC, “there are records, and then there are records.” Well, Johnny Unitas’ streak of 47 straight games with a touchdown pass was a record. And Drew Brees passed it. He has thrown a touchdown pass in 48 consecutive games. Wow. That’s all anyone can say.
Drew Brees was the first pick in the second round of the 2001 draft.
That seems like a pretty odd place for the all-time record holder in
single season passing yards to be taken, but that’s where he was. Why
was he taken there? Scouts said he was too short. He’s barely six feet
tall and often has to crane his neck to see over his offensive linemen.
He’s around the same height as Russell Wilson, another QB that the
scouts knock for being too short. However, the big thing that separates
Brees from Wilson and most other QBs in NFL history is his smarts. There
are few better in the National Football league at reading and reacting
to a defense. To me, the sign of an elite quarterback is when an
announcer says both, “You’ve gotta put pressure on this guy to beat him”
and, “he absolutely loves when the defense blitzes him” in close
proximity to each other. Nobody illustrated this catch 22 more
thoroughly than Drew Brees. If a defense plays zone and lets Drew Brees
sit back in the pocket, they have no chance of effectively stopping him.
He has such great chemistry with his receivers that they’ll reliably
find a pocket in the defense to work in and he’ll throw to that area all
day. Oftentimes, zone defenses also surrender the deep out route, and
few are better at throwing that route than Drew Brees. However, if a
defense brought the blitz and went man-to-man, they were playing a very
dangerous game. Look at what the Detroit Lions did in the 2011 NFC Wild
Card round. They brought the blitz, and Drew Brees identified where the
mismatches were all day. Darren Sproles on an outside linebacker? Brees
found him early and often when the Lions were foolish enough to rush
five guys. And if the Lions rushed six, forget about it. That left
Marques Colston one on one outside the numbers or Robert Meachem
uncovered in the seam. It was a thorough domination that could only be
delivered by one of the best quarterbacks of our generation.
Drew Brees is unlike any other quarterback in the league because of
what he means to the city of New Orleans. After Hurricane Katrina
devastated the wards, Drew Brees and his teammates were one of the first
responders. That 2006 team stood for something much larger than
football. They were one of the first rays of hope for a city that
desperately needed something, anything, to cling to. The Monday Night
game against the Falcons that doubled as the Saints’ first game back at
the Superdome was one of the top five moments of the past decade in the
NFL. Over the course of that season, Brees became the leader of that
team and a symbol of the notion that brighter days were ahead for New
Orleans. After he led them to a Super Bowl victory in 2009, Brees
instantly became forever beloved by New Orleans. Aaron Rodgers and Tom
Brady are most prominently tied to the Packers and the Patriots. For
anybody who was affected by Katrina, Drew Brees is most prominently tied
to the city of New Orleans, not the Saints. That’s why it amazed me so
much that the Saints were willing to low-ball Brees in contract
negotiations. He’s so much more than just a quarterback. He’s a living
testament to everything the city of New Orleans went through over the
years.
I’d still say that Johnny Unitas’ streak was more significant. He
did it in an era where teams threw the ball far less. Unitas was one of
the early innovators of the forward pass, and his streak came in the
time before quarterbacks threw the ball 40 times per game. Plus, the
offensive machinations of Bill Walsh and the pass heavy offenses they
encouraged would not manifest themselves for another decade or two. Even
the early passing offenses of Don Coryell were only starting to take
effect in the NFL. So, for the sheer originality of it, I’d still say
Johnny U’s streak was more impressive.
However, that should not serve to discredit what Drew Brees has
done. He broke a record that has stood for over 50 years and held by one
of the game’s all time greats. His smarts, quick release, and footwork
are used by other coaches as examples of how to correctly play the
quarterback position. He’s one of the most real, generous, and respected
players in the league whose legacy will live on long after he’s
retired. A couple of days before the game, Philip Rivers said of Brees:
“He
deserves all the recognition he’s received. I was only with him those
two years kind of early in his ascent to where he is today. He was a
heck of a player then, obviously before the Super Bowl and the other
great things he’s done since he’s come to New Orleans. It’s certainly
been impressive to see.”
You know, he still is a little short.
ARE THE PACKERS GOOD?
The Chuck Pagano story will rightfully overshadow a developing
storyline of the 2012 season. Are the Packers good? Seriously, are they
good or are they pretenders? Well, let’s take a look at how the Packers’
offense tends to operate.
It’s no secret what the Packers’ offense likes to do. When a team
has an all-star quarterback like Aaron Rodgers, they’re going to throw
the football early and often. And that’s just what the Packers have done
in pretty much every conceivable way. The West Coast offense that the
Packers like to run emphasized using the short pass to set up the long
pass and above all else, not turning the football over. Teams like the
Chargers and the Lions like to take deep shots early and often, whereas
the Packers often preferred if Aaron Rodgers read his routes from short
to deep. You’ll notice that on a lot of Aaron Rodgers’ deep throws, he
gets either an inordinate amount of time in the pocket or the receiver
is wide open. This is a direct result of the defense either
saying,“They’re throwing short passes all game: let’s get aggressive.”
(thus, the receiver is wide open) or, “He’s gearing up for the deep pass
soon, we need to call in our 6 DB Package.” (thus, Aaron Rodgers has
loads of time). The preference of the Packers’ offense seems to be the
intermediate pass or the short pass that becomes an intermediate/long
pass through yards after the catch. Teams that run West Coast offenses
(such as the Packers) or Spread offenses (such as the Patriots) are
going to use the slot receiver and the short passing game as a
substitute for the running game. In the case of the Patriots, Wes Welker
and Julian Edelman rotate as the primary slot receiver. In the Packers’
case, multiple receivers fill that role. More often than not, opponents
will be so fixated on stopping that short passing game because the
Packers had no alternative method of gaining four or five yards a play.
However, the most deadly part of the Packers’ offense is the fact that
the short, intermediate, and deep passing game are all interchangeable.
Opponents see a lot of four and five wide receiver looks, so they have
to counter with at least one matchup that is a mismatch in favor of the
Packers because the Packers usually have a deeper receiving corps than
their opponent’s secondary can effectively cover. Aaron Rodgers
distributes the ball better than almost every other quarterback in the
league because there is a mismatch on almost every play. Jordy Nelson
sometimes found himself lined up with a slot corner, safety, or even
linebacker. Sounds great to Aaron Rodgers! So if Rodgers hits Jordy
Nelson on a deep strike, the other team starts getting more conservative
and backing their corners off the line of scrimmage. If Greg Jennings
sees a corner playing off on his outside shoulder, he’ll just run the
“in” route and pick up an easy first down. The most crucial part of this
is Rodgers’ chemistry with his receivers. Greg Jennings, Jermichael
FInley, Jordy Nelson, and James Jones have all been a part of the
Packers for a couple of years now. When Rodgers can read a coverage
shell the same way his receivers read it, he’s already got the inside
track to winning the battle.
OK, so what’s changed? First of all, defenses are now more committed
to making the Packers run. When the Packers faced the Niners and the
Seahawks, Aaron Rodgers tended to see a lot of Cover 2 Zone defenses
that involved two deep safeties. Those safeties’ jobs? Keep things in
front of them. The safeties in both of those games simply read and
reacted to what they saw developing seven yards upfield. Deep safeties
that are assigned to cover large portions of the field are able to
mitigate the threat of a deep throw right off the bat. Granted, it will
never be enough to completely stop Aaron Rodgers. However, it will
significantly lessen the damage done by the West Coast attack. The basic
coverage scheme on a Packers wide receiver consists of a quick jam at
the line of scrimmage, then immediately backing into zone and letting
the receiver wander into someone else’s domain. But what’s to stop the
Packers from dinking and dunking their way to victory? The offensive
line. The Packers’ pass protection has been less than stellar so far,
allowing 21 sacks of Rodgers. That trails only the Cardinals for most in
the league. It’s getting to the point that if Aaron Rodgers can’t get
rid of the football immediately after his initial drop, he’s going to
find himself on the turf. When opponents start to put pressure on
Rodgers, it begins to undermine the foundation of the Packers’ offense.
The larger issue here is that a one-dimensional team can’t last for
long. The reasons why the Packers aren’t finding the same success this
year are the same reasons that the Wildcat and Option offenses aren’t as
successful anymore. Without some other dimension, the Packers’ passing
game is only the astronomical monster it was in 2011 until defenses
catch up. The Packers have no running game, can’t effectively stop
opposing teams who run the football, and keep going back to the same
tricks. Great football dynasties, such as the 2000s Patriots, are able
to adapt when other teams figure them out. It’s now time to see if the
Pack can do the same.
This isn’t to suggest that the Packers are a bad team. I’m sticking
with my Super Bowl pick and I’ll continue to do so for the foreseeable
future. The Packers might have the single best offensive player in the
league and the second best pass rusher in the league (Clay Matthews).
This team hasn’t been forcing turnovers like it was last year, and their
victory over the Bears shows that they win if they can control the
turnover battle. The Pack are absolutely in trouble, and a 2-3 record
better serve as a wake-up call. But after a little while, the great ones
always figure it out. Over the next few weeks, we’ll see if and how the
Packers are able to adapt.
ODDS AND DEFENSIVE ENDS: WEEK 6
- Thank you to the San Francisco 49ers for blowing out the Buffalo Bills this week. After seeing the Niners systematically dismantle the Bills into pieces, I suddenly don’t feel as bad about the Jets losing to them. In fact, I feel 90% as bad, tops. As an interesting side note, we saw Alex Smith take some shots down the field in this one. Could Alex Smith be a little more than a game manager? We’ll see.
- Poor Buffalo. Just when they think there’s something going, it gets killed. They had a 5-2 record in 2011 and finished the season at 6-10. It looked like C.J. Spiller was going to be the premier running back in Buffalo after a stellar first two weeks until he injured his knee. The Bills overpaid for Mario Williams and Mark Anderson in the offseason, two guys that had 85.5 sacks combined before they came to Buffalo. They currently have 2.5 sacks combined and are both on pace for career lows. Oh, and the defense has allowed over 1,000 total yards in just the last two games. Don’t forget about that. I feel bad for the Bills.
- I’ll take the Steelers in a win over the Titans. I’m not sure whether the Steelers are as good as I thought they were going to be, but the Titans are easily one of the league’s five worst teams. This one really shouldn’t be close, yet I feel like it will be. I don’t have confidence in Pittsburgh yet, and I feel like the Titans will hang with them for two or three quarters. In the end, Pittsburgh should put them away with a long touchdown drive in the fourth. I’ll take the Steelers by 8 or 9 points. L Titans 26, Steelers 23
- What in the name of Newton is going on with Carolina’s offense? They’ve played exactly two good games all year, and one of those games came against the Saints. My theory is that the Panthers have outsmarted themselves with the option system. There were a couple of times in their game against the Giants where Cam Newton paused at the point of exchange between him and the running back for too long and almost fumbled. The option seems like it’s so contingent on reading a defense that it becomes a battle to not tip your hand first on every play. And while Newton tries to read the defense, the defense reads him more effectively. ICarolina needs to come up with something new before they fall to 1-5.
WEEK 6 PICKS: 10-10-12
RAIDERS
AT FALCONS This is going to be a yawner. The line on this one is
Atlanta +9 and it quite frankly cannot be high enough. Matt Ryan/Julio
Jones/ Roddy White+Historically Awful Raiders secondary= 30+ point
blowout. The NFL is a firm believer in actually playing the games, and I
have no disagreement with that. But if there ever were a game that was
the equivalent of a gimme putt in golf, this is it. I’ll take Atlanta by
a score of 48-17. W Falcons 23, Raiders 20
BENGALS
AT BROWNS I’ll take the Browns. First of all, divisional games are
always going to be tough, no matter the opponent. Second of all, I’m not
entirely sure that the Bengals are that good. Their secondary is bad,
they don’t have an especially great running game, and their entire
identity is Andy Dalton throwing the ball to A.J. Green. Neither Armon
Binns nor Andrew Hawkins have truly stepped up into a number two role.
And that leads me to my last point. Joe Haden is going to be back for
this game to cover A.J. Green. Seeing as how he is the best player on
the Browns, how is this not a big deal? Isn’t this totally taking away
what the Bengals do best? I haven’t been impressed by the Bengals yet,
and I’ll keep going against them until I see a really good game from
them. W Browns 34, Bengals 24
RAMS
AT DOLPHINS I’m erring on the side of time zones severely messing with a
team’s psyche. The last time a team went into Miami from the West Coast
was the Raiders in Week 2, and they were destroyed by three touchdowns.
Are the Rams really that much better than the Raiders? The biggest
advantage that the Rams had over the Cardinals in their last game was
the Cards’ atrocious left tackle, Bobby Massie, and Kevin Kolb being due
for a reminder that he was still, in fact, Kevin Kolb. The Dolphins are
getting Reggie Bush back for this game, so expect a healthy dose of him
in a 23-16 Dolphins win. In a weak AFC, this Dolphins team is
developing as kind of a sleeper pick to sneak into the playoffs. They’ve
got a great O-Line, a good running game, and a run defense that is
allowing .5 Yards Per Carry less than anyone in the league. Stay tuned
for a potential Dolphins’ sleeper. W Dolphins 17, Rams 14
COLTS
AT JETS Even though I hate myself for doing it, I’m going to have to
take the Colts. Why wouldn’t I? The Jets don’t have a single playmaker
on either side of the football except for maybe Antonio Cromartie, and
he isn’t going to change a game single-handedly. The Colts’ greatest
weakness, a deficient secondary, will not be exposed whatsoever by the
Jets’ rotating cast of Keystone Kops wide receivers. The Colts are still
emotionally charged because of Chuck Pagano’s illness, so they’ll
probably be playing above their ceiling. Meanwhile, the crowd is going
to be so unhappy and Tebow-crazy at the Meadowlands that this might as
well be a road game for the Jets. I’ll put this one down as another
upset; Colts 21, Jets 17. L Jets 35, Colts 9
LIONS
AT EAGLES For the first time since the American Flag scored a knockout
victory over Brandon Weeden, I’m taking the Eagles. It’s sort of
unbelievable how much of a one-dimensional team that the Lions have
become. It has become increasingly clear that this is the team that was
screaming regression before the season. They came back from a 20 point
deficit twice in 2011, scored seven defensive touchdowns, and had an
offensive game plan that mostly consisted of “Throw it to Calvin Johnson
as much as possible and hope Matt Stafford doesn’t get hurt.” Just like
Carolina and Green Bay, it’s possible that the league has started to
figure the Lions out. On the other hand, the Lions lost two games
against the Titans and the Vikings that they had no business losing. The
jury is still very much out on the Lions and there’s no significantly
advantageous matchup for either team that I can see, so I’ll take the
home team. I’m going with Philly in another one or two point win. L Lions 26, Eagles 23 (OT)
CHIEFS
VS BUCS I have lost any and all confidence in the Kansas City Chiefs
this year. The Bucs haven’t played a complete game yet, but they won’t
have to in a home game against the worst team in football that isn’t
located in Cleveland. I’ll take the Bucs by a score of 30-16. W Bucs 38, Chiefs 10
COWBOYS
AT RAVENS I think that the Ravens’ offense just had an off week against
the Chiefs. Every team has a bad game, and I think we saw theirs. Also,
why, oh why are the Ravens ranked twentieth in rushing attempts? You
have Ray Rice, so USE RAY RICE. Joe Flacco is going to be throwing into
Brandon Carr and Morris Claiborne this week, so he’s probably going to
make his fair share of mistakes.The whole “unleash Joe Flacco” campaign
was fun, but it’s time for the Ravens to get back to what they do best.
They need to take an early lead, maybe give Flacco his pass attempts in
the first quarter, and then take the keys away from him and give them to
Ray Rice and Bernard Pierce. The only way the Cowboys win is if the
Ravens have a hand in their efforts. I’ll take Baltimore; 27-19. W Ravens 31, Cowboys 29
BILLS
AT CARDINALS Do the Bills have the worst defense in the league? I mean,
it’s certainly possible, right? After all that money spent on a clear
attempt to drastically overhaul the defense, the Bills somehow made it
worse. Absolutely brutal. The Cards have a number of weaknesses (namely,
their entire offense except for Larry Fitzgerald), and the Bills are
set up perfectly to give the Cards free passes on all of them. The Bills
have no pass rush, a mediocre secondary, and a gimmicky passing game
that apparently forbids a ball to be thrown over 15 yards downfield.
I’ll take Arizona in a blowout. L Bills 19, Cardinals 16 (OT)
PATRIOTS
AT SEAHAWKS I’m tempted to pick another upset here, but I’m not. It’s
uncanny that after only two consecutive good games, I’m totally sold on
the Pats’ running game. The committee of
Woodhead-Ridley-Bolden-Sometimes Vereen can attack a defense in so many
different ways depending on which one is in the game. The run blocking
has been absolutely flawless in the last two games. However, it’s going
to face a big test on the road in Seattle, who I haven’t given up on
yet. I’m still telling every football fan who will listen how awesome
Brandon Browner and Richard Sherman are. The Seattle run defense allows
3.2 yards per carry, tied for second best in the league. However,
they’ve faced some pretty bad running teams so far. It’s not extremely
difficult to allow that few rushing yards when you’re facing a steady
diet of Ryan WIlliams, an old Steven Jackson, Cedric Benson, and the
Panthers’ suddenly decrepit offense. I think that the Pats’ running game
will carry them and create opportunities down the field in a 27-17 win.
As a quick aside, it will be very interesting to see if Seattle
unleashes Russell Wilson in this game. So far, it’s been nothing but
dumpoffs, curls, slants, and fraudulent Hail Marys. I’m expecting
Seattle to start the game with a few deep balls to challenge Devin
McCourty. L Seahawks 24, Patriots 23
GIANTS
AT 49ERS This is another game where I thought about going upset and
ended.... you know what? UPSET!!!! If I’ve learned anything about the
Giants, it’s that they play their best football when the chips are down.
Every single one of their best games have been against good teams on
the road. And there’s no way that the Niners can possibly be as good as
the Jets and Bills have made them look. Something tells me that this is
going to be a bit of a let-down game for the Niners. Plus, it seems like
Ahmad Bradshaw is discovering his mojo after a 200 yard day last week
against the Browns. While there’s no way he’s going to do that again, it
shows that the Giants might be able to have some success running the
football. The only team to have success running the ball against the
Niners this year was the Vikings, and they won. The Giants are a team
that can execute the fundamentals, and that’s why they’re going to come
out ahead in this one. W Giants 26, Niners 3
VIKINGS
AT REDSKINS I’m taking Minnesota in this one. The Washington Redskins’
tackles are absolutely awful after a season-ending injury to Trent
Williams. So we could potentially see Jared Allen matched up with Tyler
Polumbus for four quarters. Are any Washington fans out there confident
in Polumbus? No? I thought not. I’ll take the Vikings over the Redskins
in a low scoring game where RG3 gets sacked in the middle of the
Redskins’ last drive. The Vikings just have too much talent on the edges
of that defense to allow a Redskins’ upset. L Redskins 38, Vikings 26
PACKERS
AT TEXANS One of the biggest problems that the Packers have this season
that I neglected to mention is that they continue to lose the battle up
front. The offensive line has now been manhandled by both the defensive
fronts of both the Seahawks and Colts. J.J. Watt was probably
salivating as he watched what Chris Clemons was able to do to them in
Week 3. Meanwhile, the Packers are absolutely a team that can be beaten
with misdirection. I have not seen disciplined play from the Packers so
far, and they tend to be too aggressive at times. The Texans are a team
that likes to run a lot of play-action and misdirection handoffs to
punish undisciplined teams, and I feel like that’s what they’ll do to
Green Bay. Houston: 35-24. L Packers 42, Texans 24
BRONCOS
AT CHARGERS I’m riding this rule until it kills me: NEVER trust the
Chargers or Norv Turner in a primetime game unless they’re playing
against a faulty long snapper named Travis Goethel. I’ll take Peyton
Manning, possibly the best night game QB of all time, against the worst
big game coach in recent memory. Denver wins this one. W Broncos 35, Chargers 24
WEEK 7: 10-15-12
ARE THE RAVENS WHO WE THOUGHT THEY WERE!?
Maybe, but maybe not. You know what this calls for? PRO-CON COMPARISON!
Pros:
The Ravens are 5-1 and would have a share of the first seed in the AFC
if the Texans were to lose tonight against the Packers (the Texans are
down 14-0 as I’m writing this). Even though the season is still young,
it’s pretty much safe to hand Baltimore the division. Their closest
competition are the Bengals, who are two games back and don’t have the
Ravens’ talent. The Steelers, who were projected to battle with
Baltimore for the divisional lead throughout the season, are currently
two games back. They have an offense that ranks tenth in the league in
DVOA and a running game that ranks fourth in DVOA.
Timeout: Notice how my use of things like DVOA, VOA, and yards per game
increased over the course of the season and my use of total yardage
statistics decreased. I gradually learned which stats were important
over the course of the season.
Ray Rice is a unique offensive weapon, and there are only a few other
teams in the league that can claim to have something similar. He is
usable in all scenarios; he can bounce outside the tackles and use his
superior acceleration, run between the tackles and follow his blockers
to daylight, catch a checkdown pass, or help out with blocking. Any team
that plays the Ravens will always have to think about Rice, no matter
the situation. This is why Baltimore can have a 65/35 pass/run ratio and
sell Joe Flacco as a legitimate threat to beat opposing defenses;
because of the threat that Rice brings to the table. And speaking of
Flacco, it seems like his maturation as an NFL QB is complete. He’s 27
and entering the prime of his career. I’m not seeing Flacco make as many
rookie mistakes as he used to. Not only that, but he’s getting more and
more comfortable throwing the deep pass. Of course, it helps that he
has speedster Torrey Smith. Ravens’ beat writers were buzzing all
through training camp about how much Smith has become a
multi-dimensional receiver. I thought that he was just a more athletic
Bernard Berrian- somebody whose only significant calling card was the
forty yard vertical- but I was wrong, big-time. He’s really worked on
his route-running and is on track to become a great receiver in the
years to come. On the defensive side of the football, veterans Haloti
Ngata and Ed Reed anchor a steady defense that was among the best in the
league in 2011. Playing from behind against the Ravens is one of the
most difficult things that any QB will have to do in the NFL because
they will bring pressure, pressure, and more pressure on the quarterback
from every conceivable formation. The Ravens have established
themselves in the 3-4 scheme over a couple of seasons and have a great
mix of both veterans and young guys under the tutelage of head coach Jon
Harbaugh. At first glance, there’s not much to find fault with about
this team.
CONS: And then you take a second glance. The Ravens are currently ranked 28th in total defense. 28th! Time Out: Apparently, I wasn’t totally off the total yardage statistics bandwagon at this point.
Not only that, but the Ravens have surrendered consecutive 200 yard
rushing performances for the first time since a year that I’m too lazy
to look up. I dismissed it when the Chiefs were able to amass 214
rushing yards because every defense has a bad day once in awhile.
Besides, the Chiefs ran the ball 51 times and passed it 17 times.
Whenever there’s that kind of imbalance in an offense, the defense is
doing something right. But this past week against the Cowboys? How is
giving up 227 rushing yards against the Cowboys explainable in any way?
The Cowboys’ O-Line ranks 27th in adjusted line yards (see
footballoutsiders.com for more detail), so there is absolutely no reason
why that should have happened. The Cowboys’ run/pass ratio was almost
1:1 (it was actually 41:36), and they possessed the ball for 40 minutes.
Another poor showing by the Ravens’ defense is alarming for a team that
built their identity on stopping opposing offenses in key situations.
Not only that, but they’ve had injury problems. Cornerback Lardarius
Webb, one of the best young corners in the league, could be out for the
season with an ACL tear. Ray Lewis may or may not have torn his triceps.
If he did, then he’ll most likely be done for the year. While he’s not
as athletic as he was in his twenties, he’s probably the most
knowledgeable player on any defense in the NFL. Center and middle
linebacker are the two positions where teams can’t afford to have
injuries because of their role in coordinating the offense
line/defensive front. Losing a leader like Ray Lewis is going to further
weaken this Baltimore defense.
Still not running away from the Ravens yet? I’ve got one more area
of concern, and that is their record in close games. They’re 4-1 in
games decided by less than a touchdown, which is a statistic that
history has shown to be largely random. I hate to play the “what if”
game with football because changing the outcome of even one play can
have unknowable ramifications on later plays. However, it’s true that
Jason Garrett’s terrible time management skills (buy the book for
details) giftwrapped the Ravens a win that statistics say they had no
business winning. The Cowboys outgained, out ball-controlled, and
outmuscled the Ravens by a healthy margin. Winning on a mismanaged clock
and a missed field goal took a little bit of luck. And that’s before we
get to the Patriots game, where Justin Tucker’s field goal could have
easily been called no good (It went directly over the right goalpost.
Adam Carolla was horrified.) So if the breaks were to go against the
Ravens, they could be 2-3 right now and every talking head in the NFL
world would be having obligatory “what’s wrong with the (insert
underperforming team here)” conversations about them. It’s definitely
not a stretch. So while they might be able to cruise to a playoff berth,
they’re highly susceptible to an early loss in the playoffs if they
keep playing like this.
I
don’t know which one is the real Baltimore Ravens, but I have a feeling
that we’ll gain more insight after their marquee matchup with the
Texans this week.
WHO’S GOOD IN THE AFC?
Well, the answer to that question has multiple parts. There are a
number of teams that are on different levels right now. Some are better
than they’ve played, some are unquestionably worse. So, without further
ado, let’s break it down by division.
AFC
East- Shockingly enough, all four teams in this division are at 3-3
right now. And while the New York Jets are technically the division
leader, the New England Patriots are still the best team by far. I’m
frantically snapping screenshots of the standings on my phone so I can
look back at them in Week 15 when the Jets are 6-7. Maybe it isn’t a
foregone conclusion that the Patriots win the division, but it’s readily
apparent that the lead is New England’s to lose. And the team that they
are most likely to lose it to may very well be the Dolphins instead of
the Jets. They can run the ball effectively and have a killer run
defense. They’re the only team in the division with any type of identity
besides the Patriots. But 10-6 might be good enough to take the East
this year, and the Pats are the only team that has the talent and the
schedule to get there. Here is the Pats’ schedule for the next seven
weeks: home for the Jets, at the Rams, bye, home for the Bills, home for
the Colts, at the Jets, at the Dolphins. It’s not out of the question
for the Pats to enter their showdown with the Houston Texans at 9-3. New
England has the inside track to win the division, and it’s going to
take something catastrophic to take that away.
AFC
North- Once again, we have a clear division frontrunner. The Baltimore
Ravens might have played above their true ceiling for a significant
portion of the season so far, but there’s nobody in the North can rise
up to challenge them. A healthy Steelers team might be able to match
them, but it’s clear that the Steelers’ defense that is ranked 26th in
DVOA barely resembles your father’s Steelers. Baltimore is without a
doubt the most complete team in the division, and every other team has a
glaring weakness. For the Steelers, it’s their offensive line and pass
rush. For the Bengals, it’s their secondary. For the Browns, it’s their
everything not named Trent Richardson, Joe Haden, or Joe Thomas. Even a
semi-washed up Ravens team should easily capture the AFC North crown.
AFC
South- A more clear division winner than the 2012 Texans have never
existed. I’m not even going to waste the time needed to give an argument
to validate them. Congrats, Texans, you won the South already.
AFC
West- This seems like it’s a two team race between the Chargers and the
Broncos, numbers one and three on my list of NFL teams I don’t trust
(the Eagles are number two). Reports about Peyton Manning’s arm seem
exaggerated to me. Yes, he doesn’t have nearly the arm strength that he
had pre-surgery, but everybody should have expected that. What, you
thought a guy in his late thirties with a fused spine should throw like
he did in college? Absolutely not. Time
Out: Throughout the book, I’ve been posing rhetorical questions that
combatively accuse you of thinking things that you probably weren’t
thinking. I apologize if you weren’t actually thinking about these things. The Broncos don’t have a 100% Manning, but they don’t have Charlie Frye either. Time Out: A reference that’s both obscure and dated. I’ve outdone myself. He’s
still a perfectly capable NFL quarterback. They might not have much
else, but they at least have that. I’m going to hold comment on the
Chargers because I still don’t know what to make of them. Philip Rivers
looks improved this year; he’s stopped throwing into double coverage as
much. However, the running game is still struggling to find its way and
the defense is only average. In fact, the Chargers rank sixteenth in
DVOA at 5% worse than the league average. This leaves an intriguing
possibility. Could someone else win the West? Seeing as how they have
not held a lead in regulation this season, I’m writing off the Chiefs
and saying a sweet goodnight to my 2012 AFC sleeper pick. That leaves
the Raiders. Hmmmm... Assuming that the Broncos win tonight’s game, that
would leave the Raiders 1.5 games behind the division lead. Besides a
November road game against the Ravens, the Raiders have nothing but
winnable games left. These include two pushover games against the
Chiefs, a game against the Jags, a game against the Bucs, and a home
game against the Browns. Why couldn’t Oakland go 5-0 in those games?
Their secondary is terrible and they’d almost certainly be run out of
the stadium by whoever they face in the playoffs, but they could still
get the division. My official pick to win the division for now is the
Broncos. However, I in no way feel confident about that.
Wild
Cards- Now this is where things get interesting. I count five teams
(Jets, Dolphins, Bengals, Steelers, and the Chargers/Broncos) who could
get into the playoffs as a Wild Card. Barring anything completely out of
left field, these five teams are going to go back and forth all season
for a chance at the playoffs. Only the Chargers are above .500 for the
season so far. On my quest to hijack every Football Outsiders statistic
for the book, I came across a statistic called DAVE. It combines
pre-season projections with DVOA in an attempt to forecast how a certain
team will fare for the rest of the season. Out of the teams I
mentioned, the Broncos placed first, ranking in at number eight. The
team that came next, at number 12? The Miami Dolphins. Again, identity
matters. And as a side note, I’m on the verge of admitting that I
completely screwed up in evaluating Tannehill. The next team, which is
ranked at number 13? The Pittsburgh Steelers. Because the great teams
always figure it out. The Steelers’ continuity is going to serve them
well when it comes time for the Wild Card races in December. DAVE
despises both the Bengals and the Jets, who are 25th and 24th
respectively. DAVE pretty much agrees with my thought process right now;
the Steelers and the Dolphins are two teams that know what they’re
supposed to be and have the talent to get there. They’re good, the
division leaders are elite (with the exception of Denver/San Diego), and
everybody else is on the outside looking in. Whether the Jets, Bengals,
or Chargers can kick their game up a notch and grab a Wild Card spot
remains to be seen
ODDS AND DEFENSIVE ENDS: WEEK 7
- . Remember when I said last week that it would be interesting to see what the Packers do to rebound after the loss to Indy? Packers 42, Texans 24. Yep, very interesting indeed. That was the 2011 Aaron Rodgers. Once Rodgers gets locked into the zone and starts throwing bullets to covered receivers that somehow end up right in their hands, the other team might as well pack it in. That was unbelievable. The Pack needed a big win in the worst way and Aaron Rodgers just said, “I’ve got this”, then threw for six touchdowns. That’s what a team leader is supposed to do and that’s why Rodgers is still the best QB in the league.
- What did I say about not trusting the San Diego Chargers in primetime games? This was a new low even for the Chargers. Really, you can’t hold on to a 24 point lead? It’s getting to be that bad? That was just a perfect storm of turnovers, Norv Turner, Peyton Manning getting hot at the worst possible time, Norv Turner, bad defense, and more Norv Turner.
- Quote from some dumb writer named Andrew Goldstein from a section that he wrote this past Friday
RAIDERS
AT FALCONS This is going to be a yawner. The line on this one is
Atlanta +9 and it quite frankly cannot be high enough. Matt Ryan/Julio
Jones/ Roddy White+Historically Awful Raiders secondary= 30+ point
blowout. The NFL is a firm believer in actually playing the games, and I
have no disagreement with that. But if there ever were a game that was
the equivalent of a gimme putt in golf, this is it. I’ll take Atlanta by
a score of 48-17.
Atlanta 23, Oakland 20 (OT).The lesson, as has been true so many other times, is that I’m an idiot.
- Isn’t it unbelievable that the Chiefs have not led in regulation this year? Through six games, the Kansas City Chiefs have only held a lead in overtime. Once the RedZone channel put the Chiefs’ game on and Andrew Siciliano said, “The Chiefs could take their first lead of the year on this drive”, Brady Quinn threw an interception. Kansas City is on a bye this week and then is home for Oakland after that, so it’s possible that KC could finish the month of October without ever holding a regulation lead. Pitiful.
- I have one last shocking statistic. Not to go all Tim Kurkjian on you, but guess how many times the Carolina Panthers have called a designed running play on third down as of October 17th. Just guess; I’ll wait.
(Cue Jeopardy Music)
And..... time! Well, here’s the answer. Three. The Panthers have
intentionally run the ball on third down exactly three times all year.
With a backfield that they’re paying a combined 50 million dollars to.
Why is everybody going nuts over how awesome OC Rob Chudzinski’s running
game is if he won’t even use it when he needs it the most?
WEEK 7 PICKS
SEAHAWKS
VS NINERS The Niners could not be more of a lock in this one. I’ll
admit that the Seahawks’ win over the Pats was absolutely impressive.
They deserve all the credit in the world for it. However, the road has
not been kind to Seattle this year. They’ve gone 3-0 so far at home and
1-2 on the road. Both of their road losses have come against divisional
opponents (Arizona and St Louis) that confused Russell Wilson and goaded
him into making bad throws. History has also shown us that teams coming
off an emotional high are bound to hit an emotional low the next week
before balancing out. After a huge win over the Pats, it only makes
sense that the Seahawks are going to come out a little bit flat on a
short week against a ticked off Niners team. I’ll take San Fran: 28-17. W Niners 13, Seahawks 6
TITANS
AT BILLS This game makes the NBA Pre-Season look watchable. I’ll take
the Bills in this one because there’s no way the Titans are winning two
games in a row. Their defense is just too atrocious. There’s nobody on
this entire Titans team that can stop C.J. Spiller. Or Stevie Johnson. I
wish I could give you more insight on this one, but I can’t find
interesting things to say about either team. When the RedZone Channel
shows this game, that’s my cue for a bathroom or food break. L Titans 35, Bills 34
BROWNS
AT COLTS Swiiiiing and a miss, strike two on the early games. Looks
like it’s just going to be one of those weeks. I think that Andrew Luck
is going to find his second and third options very often in this
game.This Browns’ defense is just an unbelievable mosh pit of poor
tackling, and I think Luck will exploit that by throwing the ball in the
middle of the field to Fleener as well as isolating the speedy T.Y.
Hilton in space. I can definitely imagine a scenario where the Browns
pull off an upset, but I’m playing it safe on this one. I’ll go with the
Colts to win by 10, and at least two big penalties against Browns’
cornerback Buster Skrine. I can’t emphasize enough how terribly he’s
played so far. W Colts 17, Browns 13
CARDINALS
AT VIKINGS And we finally have our first good early game. I think
you’re going to see a big game from Jared Allen as he matches up against
D’Bobbie Mastiste (I figured we should just combine both bad Cardinals’
tackles into one super-bad tackle) and the rest of the Cards’ hit
parade of atrocious offensive linemen. The Vikings are a good team with a
solid offense that just had a bad game last week against Washington. We
all knew it had to happen eventually. Meanwhile, the Cardinals are free
falling (yes they’re freeeee, freeeeeee faaaalling) after losses to
both St Louis and Buffalo. In those losses, they gave up a combined
total of 14 sacks and made Mario Williams look like not a total waste of
money. I’m taking Minnesota by at least 7. W Vikings 21, Cardinals 14
PACKERS
AT RAMS The Pack is back! I’ll take the Pack in another big win simply
because it feels like Aaron Rodgers is in the zone right now. I don’t
think that the St Louis secondary is deep enough to handle all the
weapons that the Packers’ offense can utilize. I’d expect a big day from
either Randall Cobb or James Jones and the Packers to win 35-20. I’m
really sold on the fact that Aaron Rodgers might have just had a slow
start to the season. We’ll see after this week. W Packers 30, Rams 20
REDSKINS
AT GIANTS UPSET PICK!!! Even though Bill Barnwell has successfully
debunked the myth that the Giants’ one or two terrible home games per
year are worse than any other team’s, the fact is that they still
happen. And if the Giants still have another bad home game left to play
this year, wouldn’t it make sense that it comes against a divisional
opponent that can effectively attack the Giants’ secondary? I’d think
so. Don’t forget that as impressive as the Giants looked in that win
over San Fran, they’ve looked equally unimpressive in losses to the
Cowboys and Eagles. I think that the Giants are most susceptible to
teams who know them the best, and the Redskins beat this same Giants
team twice last year. With the arrival of RG3, I think it’s not a
stretch to make it three in a row. Redskins: 34-19. L Giants 27, Redskins 23
SAINTS
AT BUCS Why not go for the Saints? I’m a huge believer in the power of
Drew Brees after a bye week. I also happen to believe that the Bucs are
not a good team. The only complete game that they’ve played so far has
been against the Chiefs, quite possibly the worst team in the league.
Now that Aqib Talib has been suspended for admitting to Adderall usage,
this Bucs secondary has nobody except Mark Barron, and he’s struggled in
coverage this year. The Saints are going to pick up right where they
left off against the Chargers. I’ll take them in a 37-28 win. W Saints 35, Bucs 28
COWBOYS
AT PANTHERS This is a must-win game for both teams. I really shouldn’t
say that, because Carolina currently looks like it’s at the point of no
return for the 2012 season. The wisdom of re-signing the core players of
2010’s 2-14 season is starting to blot out anything that Cam Newton is
doing. The Boys have fantastic coverage corners in Morris Claiborne and
Brandon Carr, but they’re also very physical players. When going against
the Panthers, nothing is more important than setting the edge. You
can’t let Newton or DeAngelo Williams run outside the tackles. Carr and
Claiborne are one of those rare corner duos that are also superb
tacklers for their position. Dallas is too good of a football team to be
eliminated from contention this early in the season. The same cannot be
said for the Panthers. I’ll take Dallas. W Cowboys 19, Panthers 14
RAVENS
AT TEXANS Welcome to the marquee matchup of Week 7. However, it feels
like this may not be the best game when all is said and done. The Ravens
are going to miss injured corner Lardarius Webb in the worst way
because he could defend nickel runs. As Michael Lombardi pointed out on a
recent episode of the BS report, nickel runs (teams lining up with
three wide receivers and a tight end, then handing it off to the RB) are
becoming a bigger and bigger part of the league because it limits the
number of defenders that can be near the line of scrimmage at any given
time. Lombardi identified Webb as one of the rare slot corners that
could both cover a receiver like a cornerback and play the run like a
linebacker. Since he’s out, the Ravens have a pretty poor run defense.
They do have Haloti Ngata, but he’s not going to be very useful because
the Texans like to employ stretch runs and zone blocking principles to
spread defenses from side to side. Also, he may or may not have a
debilitating knee injury. That, too, might be a problem. Arian Foster
and Ben Tate are just going to repeatedly run away from Ngata and into
various holes created by their terrific offensive line. I feel like this
is a game where both teams aren’t going to play their best, but the one
who can run the ball more effectively will win. And right now, I feel
like that team is the Texans. 21-10 Texans is my call. W Texans 43, Ravens 13
JAGS
AT RAIDERS This game and Jets-Pats are our only two late games of the
day. I have absolutely no interest whatsoever in this game, so I’m
staying tuned to Jets-Pats for the late slot instead of going for the
Red Zone channel. I feel like the Raiders are going to get back on track
in this one for two reasons. First of all, it’s always invigorating to
an upstart team when they play one of the league’s best teams and keep
it close. Second of all, I have absolutely no confidence whatsoever in
Blaine Gabbert after the time zone shift does a number on him.
Shockingly enough, I had no confidence in Blaine Gabbert without him
flying cross country into the most hostile environment in football. I’d
take the Raiders in a blowout. W Raiders 26, Jaguars 23 (OT)
JETS
AT PATS I would really love to pretend that the Jets’ blowout win over
the Colts was a sign of things to come, but I know better. In SAT prep, I
was told that the average SAT subject gets the easy problems right,
about half the medium problems right, and none of the hard problems
right. As I heard that, I thought, “Wow, this describes the 2011-2013
Jets to a T.” They will never fail to make themselves look good by
beating up on the worst teams, they’ll beat average teams about half the
time, and they will never beat good teams. The only thing that can
really rattle Tom Brady is pressure, and the Jets have consistently
failed to bring it. This is the week that Pats fans will breathe a
collective sigh of relief as Brady has one of those, “28-38 320 yards 2
TDs 0 INTs” kind of games and the new law firm of
Woodhead-Ridley-Bolden-Sometimes Vereen sinks the Jets by converting key
intermediate third downs all day long. It’s exactly what happened in
Week 5 of 2011, and I have no doubt it will happen here as well. In
fact, I’ll even predict the same score as that Week 5 game. 30-21 Pats. W Patriots 29, Jets 26 (OT)
STEELERS
AT BENGALS Are the Steelers even that good? I really don’t know what to
think here. Troy Polamalu is sitting this one out with a calf injury,
James Harrison and LaMarr Woodley have been getting minimal pressure on
opposing QBs, and the Steelers rank 22nd in DVOA against the pass. Even
though a lot of people say that the Steelers are shifting from a
defensively-minded team to an offensively minded one, let’s not kid
ourselves. The offense is staying at the same level that it performed at
in the last two seasons and the defense is declining, so the offense
just looks better by comparison. In fact, the offense might also be
regressing. The Steelers currently rank 12th in offensive DVOA. They
have not finished a season ranked that far down the list since 2008. Of
course, we have a pretty small sample size with the Steelers (5 games to
be exact). However, these stats show that the Steelers are moving
downward, not laterally. I expect that downward slide to continue on the
road against a divisional opponent that’s angry after a loss to
Cleveland. I’ll take the Bengals by a score of 28-24. L Steelers 24, Bengals 17
LIONS
AT BEARS I feel very comfortable about taking a 4-1 Chicago Bears team
that’s at home and fresh off their bye week. I’m not especially
impressed with the Lions’ defense, and I feel like the Bears are going
to have the chance to outmuscle them. The 2011 Lions’ defense was
predicated on making the big play, and those plays have not been made
this year. Meanwhile, the Bears’ D has been making big plays virtually
every single game. How about four defensive touchdowns in the last two
games? Does that sound good? The only way that the Bears lose this game
is if Jay Cutler has a significant hand in sinking the offense from
within. The Bears are going to want to do what they always do with
Cutler; keep it on the ground early and often with Matt Forte and
Michael Bush while mixing in Brandon Marshall and Alshon Jeffery. Time Out: No clue why I was so in on Alshon Jeffery week after week.
The Lions are undisciplined and will shoot themselves in the foot
eventually: the Bears just can’t give them extra opportunities to redeem
themselves. I don’t think that’ll be a problem in this one. I’ll go
with the Bears, 23-17. W Bears 13, Lions 7
WEEK 8: 10-21-12
DRAFT PICKS REVISITED
It
seems like everybody forgets about the events of the NFL draft except
for a few select rookies that make some noise. Within about a year or
so, nobody will remember who the fourth pick was in the 2012 draft (it
was Andrew Goldstein favorite Matt Kalil, by the way). But I believe in
accountability. I made some predictions back in May of 2012 when I
started writing this book, and it’s time to revisit two of those
predictions in particular to see how things are going.
Prediction Number One:Matt Kalil will end up being a better player than Trent Richardson.
I
was kinda right and kinda wrong on this one. Let’s start with the
wrong. I said that it was stupid of the Browns to trade up for Trent
Richardson, which I’m not willing to admit that I’m completely wrong
about yet. First of all, Richardson has missed significant time with rib
injuries this season. And as Michael Vick could tell you, rib injuries
are a seriously nagging problem that might force you to wear a military
grade Kevlar vest during games (no, seriously. Vick essentially wears a
bulletproof vest under his uniform). Secondly, Richardson is developing
in an offense where opponents will single him out from the rest of the
offense and stack the box to stop him because of the lack of respect
paid to quarterback Brandon Weeden. However, I was wrong about his
actual performance. He’s been everything that the Browns drafted him as
and then some. Even legendary running back Jim Brown, who once called
Richardson an “ordinary back” has changed his opinion on the first year
player from Alabama. Still, that doesn’t explain why the Browns gave up
extra picks when they probably could have just picked Trent Richardson
fourth and kept those picks. Even though it was a relatively small
prize, the Vikes played the Browns like a grand piano on that trade.
They created a market for the third pick, capitalized on the Browns’
fears that another team was moving up to take Richardson, and then
milked them for the extra picks.
Meanwhile, I was right when I said that Kalil would be the better
fit for the Vikings. People (yes, including me) forget that Adrian
Peterson is a physical freak of nature that can come back from an ACL
injury in a fraction of the expected time and play like nothing ever
happened. The Vikes smartly realized that they needed to protect their
investment, Christian Ponder, and they took steps to make that happen.
My Uncle Jim, who is a huge Vikings’ fan, was gushing over how much
better Kalil is than Charlie Johnson. I’m inclined to agree with him.
Try to remember the last time your team either had a shaky offensive
line or lost a great left tackle or center. You never noticed how good
they were until you didn’t have them anymore, right? It’s extremely
unsettling to know that your QB is always one play away from getting
wiped out because of terrible blocking on the edges. Arizona fans know
what I’m talking about. Kevin Kolb is currently not speaking to Bobby
Massie or D’Anthony Baptiste. The Vikes definitely didn’t make the
polarizing pick that would get all the fans talking. Instead, they made
the smart one and more importantly, the right one for them. It was
probably stupid of me-nay, definitely stupid of me- to compare a running
back and an offensive lineman. However, I don’t feel like I’m wrong
when I say that Kallil was the right pick for the Vikes.
Prediction Number Two: The Bucs’ first found choices didn’t fit their needs.
I
was grossly wrong on at least one player. That player would be Mark
Barron, the guy that Tampa traded out of the top six to get. The Tampa
Bay Bucs currently rank first in the league in adjusted line yards
allowed, and that’s in no small part due to Barron. In my
short-sightedness, I failed to realize what I should have realized all
along. Picking Morris Claiborne would not have been the right move for
Tampa. Don’t get me wrong, Claiborne is an absolutely fantastic player
who has the requisite skills to have a great career. However, the Bucs’
defense had too many holes in the secondary and featured too many guys
that were question marks (Bowers, Clayborn, Talib, Barber, etc) for them
to pick a player that would ultimately only address a single problem.
Barron is versatile and can be used in a variety of different ways, thus
addressing multiple holes in the Bucs’ defense. His capacity for
playing the run was never in question; his claim to fame during his
college career was hard-hitting run defense in the box. After a Bucs’
mauling of the Chiefs, Scott Reynolds from pewterreport.com wrote an
article detailing Barron’s Pro Bowl case. He pointed out that,
“Barron... has 35 tackles through five games, which ranks third on the
team behind linebackers Mason Foster (43) and Lavonte David (41). That’s
eight more stops than [Eric] Berry had at this point in his rookie
season. Barron also has forced a fumble and recorded an interception, in
addition to breaking up seven passes this season.” And to think that
this is only his rookie season. The lesson, as always, is that I’m an
idiot. Please never forget that. I’m going to reserve judgment on Doug
Martin until I get a bigger sample size, but he definitely seems
competent so far. However, it seems somewhat telling that the Bucs never
once thought to hand the ball to Martin when they had first and goal on
the one against the Saints this past week. They ran LaGarrette Blount
into the pile three straight times and came away with -1 yards to show
for it. Then, they called a Josh Freeman rollout on fourth down that
inevitably failed. Personally, I think that was a bad series of calls by
the Bucs’ coaching staff instead of a referendum on Martin’s toughness.
However, it does show that the Bucs aren’t ready to commit to him yet.
Regardless, the Bucs’ draft class has proved me 100% wrong so far.
QUOTES OF THE YEAR SO FAR
Since I don’t have any ideas for new things to write 1,000 words
about (wow, it sucked having six teams off last week), I’m going to
hijack some Football Outsiders quotes and maybe try to break them down a
little bit. I am not good at finding sound-bytes, and one of the things
that Football Outsiders deserves all the credit in the world for is
finding memorable quotes. Wading through the boring press conferences of
Aaron Rodgers and Bill Belichick-Bot 3000 to find the few good quotes
out there is tough work, and I’m now going to steal some of those verbal
gold nuggets that they found and try to make heads or tails of them.
Ready? Go!
Some of these quotes are from college football. All quotes are from
Football Outsiders’ “The Week in Quotes” section and are re-stated in
italics exactly how they are presented there.
QUOTE 1: "Do
you know what I hate? I hate Twitter. I think these guys are young
guys, and I think 'Tweet this, Spacebook that.' Whatever. We've got to
go play the game. We don't have any hatred for Iowa." -- Penn State head
coach Bill O'Brien, on a Tweet one of his players made about hating Iowa
REACTION
1: Now there’s a quote that my grandpa will approve of! And where can I
get myself a SpaceBook account? That sounds awesome.
QUOTE 2: "We don’t have any defenses designed to give up 50-yard touchdowns." -- Patriots head coach Bill Belichick, on criticism for his defense
REACTION
2: As long as you’re starting Devin McCourty and Alfonzo Dennard,
pretty much every defensive alignment that you call is designed to give
up a 50 yard touchdown.
QUOTE 3: "If you tell Ray you hear he's not playing any more, he'd freaking kill you." -- Ravens quarterback Joe Flacco, on Ray Lewis
REACTION
3: Not great word choice by Flacco here. It’s not a figure of speech,
Joe. He actually di- nah, maybe we should just move on.
QUOTE 4: "I love Coach. I said it before, I'd take a bullet for Coach. " -- Castillo, on his firing
REACTION
4: This isn’t just being late to the party; this is like arriving at
the party once everybody is filing out. Juan, buddy, what do you think
Coach just had you do for him?
QUOTE 5: "Why
should we have to go to class when we came here to play FOOTBALL, we
ain't come here to play SCHOOL, classes are POINTLESS." -- Ohio State backup quarterback Cardale Jones, on his education
REACTION
5: I don’t really know if Cardale Jones was lighting up the 2015 NFL
Draft Boards, but it’s safe to say that may not be the case anymore.
QUOTE 6 (Not listed in The Week in Quotes yet, but absolutely will be when the Week 7 version is released): “I eat burritos bigger than you”-- Texans’ defensive end J.J. Watt trash talking Ray Rice
REACTION
6: If my earlier piece on Watt plus this quote isn’t enough to convince
you to get on the bandwagon, nothing will ever convince you. J.J. Watt
is awesome. There’s really nothing more to say.
QUOTE 7: "I'm just wondering why they didn't go back and take Michael Strahan’s sack away from him when they broke the record." -- Texans defensive coordinator Wade Phillips, on the Elias Sports Bureau taking a sack away from J.J. Watt
REACTION 7: They took a sack away from J.J. Watt? How dare they!? That’s it, I’m protesting Elias Sports Bureau.
QUOTE 8: "We
have fans all over the US and I think it is time that they RISE UP and
snatch back what satan, himself, has stolen." -- Wife of Auburn head
coach Gene Chizik, Jonna, discussing the team on Facebook
REACTION
8: I have no clue what I’m rising up for, what’s been stolen by Satan,
or why Auburn fans should care about it. If she’s talking about the
national championship, then the trophy is gonna stay in Satan’s hands
for a little while Auburn waits for another Cam Newton. But yeah, I’m
totally willing to RISE UP. Not sure what I’m RISING UP for, but I’ll do
it. Anytime you need me.
QUOTE 9: "Floyd,
what do you think about this? What has it been like in Minnesota this
year? I can't hear you. Do you have a preference on what sideline you'd
rather be on?" -- ESPN sideline reporter Lewis Johnson, interviewing a statue of a pig
REACTION
9: And really, that’s reason number 730,478 why sports are so awesome.
Let’s not dwell on the fact that the winner of each year’s
Iowa-Minnesota game is rewarded with an ugly pig statue. A football game
actually prompted ESPN to say, “Hey, Lewis, why don’t you go down there
to the sideline and interview the pig trophy? No, there’s no such thing
as an awful announcing blog; why do you ask?” Nowhere else in the world
would this happen but sports. Could we maybe replace the Nobel Peace
Prize trophies with hideously unattractive pig statues? And last but not
least
QUOTE OF THE YEAR (at least so far....): "We
should have done a better job of accounting for him, and keeping an I
Spy on him wherever he is. Essentially don’t throw in that area or throw
extremely high. He’s six-six, and he can jump 30 inches, so he’s
probably like 15 feet by the time you add it all up." -- Jets owner Woody Johnson, on how the Jets should have played Watt
REACTION
10: A quote that involves J.J. Watt, my team, and my team’s
semi-incompetent owner named Woody Johnson? Count me in! Is it a bad
thing that my favorite team’s owner thinks that six feet and a half plus
two feet and a half equals fifteen feet? That’s a bad sign, right?
ODDS AND DEFENSIVE ENDS: WEEK 8
- Wow, this has turned into a long book. And I’ve still got ten more weeks and change of regular season plus the Playoffs to go before it’s over. Thank you very, very much to what will undoubtedly be the fifty or so people that stuck it out until this point. Through this book, I’ve gotten the unique opportunity to use football as an excuse to not take AP English. It’s safe to say that I got more out of writing this book than I ever would have out of essays on The Crucible (again, sorry Mr. Lapinski).
- We have our London game this week between the Pats and the Rams! First of all, it’s a bit puzzling how the NFL keeps scheduling these crappy games in London. Bears-Bucs, Pats-Bucs, Giants-Dolphins in the first London game, and so on and so forth. It’s a little bit telling that the biggest and best teams often won’t agree to give up a home game to play in London. What’s the incentive to forfeiting a home game for London if you’re a mediocre team? I don’t see the NFL catching on internationally unless this problem gets a definitive answer.
- I’ll take the Vikings over the Bucs on Thursday Night. However, the rest of the Vikes’ schedule is very interesting. After going to Seattle next week, they play four divisional opponents in a row with a bye week after the first one (home for Detroit, bye, in Chicago, in Green Bay, home for Chicago). That’s really tough. They also have a road game in Houston left on their schedule. And they have a young QB. This entire situation could not scream “letdown!” any louder. L Bucs 36, Vikings 17
- It seems like just about every single team in the AFC has sleeper potential except for my preseason sleeper pick. RIP 2012 Kansas City Chiefs- the Andrew Goldstein Approved sleeper. May the football gods bring both them and Bob Fescoe’s vocal chords peace.
· WEEK 8 PICKS: 10-24-12
PANTHERS
AT BEARS And we’re off to a great start on the early games! The line on
this one right now is Bears by 9, but it could be Bears by 20 and I’d
still briefly consider betting on them. Chicago wins in a blowout. Next. W Bears 23, Panthers 22
CHARGERS
AT BROWNS I think the Chargers’ sole purpose of existence right now is
to mess with the head of every single analyst and gambler on the planet.
Every time you think they’re about to zig, they zag, and vice versa.
With the Browns becoming the hot upset pick this week, it’s almost a
lock that the Chargers are gonna win this one. When an upset pick is
described as a “popular pick”, then that’s one to stay away from. And
once the Chargers blow out the Browns, Chiefs, and Bucs, everybody is
going to get back on their bandwagon so I can pick against them. Never
trust the Chargers to lose, either. L Browns 7, Chargers 6
SEAHAWKS
AT LIONS It’s just about desperation time for Detroit. They’re not
going to sniff the playoffs in a super-deep NFC with a 2-5 record. It
just won’t happen. The Seahawks had a long week to get ready for
Detroit, while the Lions suffered an ugly loss to Chicago and now must
turn around on a short week to face a chippy Seahawks squad. Detroit is a
sloppy team, and it’s not going to get better after facing a stout
Seattle defense. I’m picking Seattle to get a tough road win here and
knock the Lions out of playoff contention. L Lions 28, Seahawks 24
JAGS
AT PACKERS Well, it looks like everybody that’s still alive in the
Eliminator Challenge on ESPN gets a freebie this week. This one could
have been close, but the Jags are really gonna miss all of that
production from Blaine Gabbert. Aaron Rodgers is great and all, but I
bet that he wishes he could be half the QB that Gabbert is. Somehow, the
Packers should struggle through to a 38-7 win. W Packers 24, Jaguars 15
COLTS
AT TITANS Do you realize that by the end of this game, the Titans could
be at .500 or the Colts could be over .500? I had no idea that the AFC
was this terrible. The scary thing is, this game is actually an awesome
matchup for the Titans. Did you see what Shonn Greene was able to do to
the Colts’ front seven? Or how the Jets’ O-Line was able to consistently
open up giant gaps for Greene to run through? Chris Johnson can’t run
through contact at all, but he can accelerate through gaps quicker than
any other running back in the league. I think that Luck will keep the
Colts in this game, but the Titans are going to dominate the time of
possession by keeping it on the ground with Chris Johnson. Titans win
24-20 and everybody will think that Chris Johnson is back before he gets
shut down by the Bears next week. L Colts 19, Titans 13 (OT)
PATS
AT RAMS London game!! The Pats are very easy upset targets, and I
thought about going down that road for a little while before wisely
backing away. I think this is going to be Brady’s revenge game, where
he’s visibly pissed about how the last couple games have gone and he
just goes off for five touchdowns. We’ve seen it before, and we’re even
more likely to see it against a severely jet-lagged Rams team. I’m going
with a Pats win by a margin of over two touchdowns where they score
more than 35 points. If that happens, I’ll also bet on under 1.5
mentions of the Pats’ abominable secondary by NFL analysts this week. W Patriots 45, Rams 7
DOLPHINS AT JETS Is it weird that I’m kinda, maybe, sorta back in on the Jets this year? Time Out: Yes. Yes, that is weird. They
haven’t looked incompetent at any point in their last three games, and
they might have taken down the Texans if J.J. Watt didn’t eat burritos
that were bigger than Ray Rice. They’re not a quality team, but I think
that they’re effective against other non-elite teams. And with the
Dolphins’ porous secondary coming to town, would it be so strange to
expect a half decent game from Sanchez? Plus, Ryan Tannehill is overdue
to look terrible again, and aggressive 46 defenses have the tendency to
make young QBs look bad. I’ll take the Jets, 23-16. L Dolphins 30, Jets 9
FALCONS
AT EAGLES I’m not gonna overthink this one too much; I’m taking Atlanta
to run their record to 7-0. Do first games with new defensive
coordinators in mid-season ever work out well? I couldn’t find the stats
for them, but I’m assuming the answer is no. The Falcons needed that
bye week to recover from near losses to both Carolina and Oakland, but
they should be fine against Philly. The dirty little secret of the
Philly defense is that you can absolutely throw the ball at Nnamdi
Asomugha. Antonio Brown, for instance, beat him a couple times on
important throws. Why can’t Julio Jones do that this week? He’s got the
speed to beat Nnamdi down the field, and he’s physical enough to fight
off jams. I’ll take the Falcons by at least five and over 100 yards for
Julio Jones with at least one touchdown. W Falcons 30, Eagles 17
REDSKINS
AT STEELERS Another reason why I could never join Bill Simmons and
Cousin Sal on their weekly “Guess the Lines” podcast; I would have NEVER
imagined that the Steelers are favored by five points in this game.
They haven’t played a complete game yet this year! Their O-Line looks
terrible, I still have no clue what’s going on with Rashard Mendenhall’s
health, and “plodding” would be a nice step up in terms of ways you
could describe the Steelers’ D without Troy Polamalu. And the, “well,
they don’t have Polamlau” excuse holds no water anymore because he
always gets injured. A year or two ago, we reached the point with
Polamalu where injuries were a regular occurrence instead of a random
irregularity. The defense has to find ways to adapt without Polamalu,
and so far they have not done that. The Redskins win this game by 10 and
everybody suddenly realizes how old the Steelers’ D is. L Steelers 27, Redskins 12
RAIDERS
AT CHIEFS We now have two afternoon games for this week as well, and
one of them is this stinker. Ew. Just ew. I refuse to give this game the
time of day. I’ll take the Raiders and move on very quickly. W Raiders 26, Chiefs 16
GIANTS
AT COWBOYS While I’m giving out dirty little secrets about defenses,
let me remind you about this for the Giants. Their corners suck. The
Giants rank 26th in the league in DVOA vs #1 wide receivers, and 25th in
DVOA against receivers that are not listed as X (first), Z (second), or
Y (tight end) in the playbooks. Say what you will about the Cowboys,
but they do have a deep receiving corps. I’m still waiting for another
big game from Kevin Ogletree and another Eli Manning stinker. I feel
like both are overdue, and both are going to happen in a huge divisional
game. Then again, Eli with the ball in a tie game with three minutes
left (which is probably what this will come down to), terrifies me.
Against my better instinct, I’m going against the Giants for the second
week in a row. I’ll take the Cowboys by a field goal. L Giants 29, Cowboys 24
SAINTS
AT BRONCOS Drew Brees and the explosive Saints’ offense, meet the
Broncos. The Broncos have a very good quarterback, but a terrible
defense. In fact, the Broncos have trailed by 20 points in the majority
of their games. Also, their quarterback has a surgically reconstructed
neck, so you can quite literally kill his head if you wanted to. Whoops,
I can’t say that in the book unless I want Roger Goodell to suspend me
for eight paragraphs. The Broncos are somehow the second best AFC team
right now despite having quite literally nothing else besides Peyton
Manning. Seriously, try to name one other thing that Denver is good at
besides making the score look closer than it was in a losing effort and
getting Norv Turner fired. I’m not saying the Saints are suddenly a good
team either, but Drew Brees sure is a good QB. I’ll take the Saints,
41-28. L Broncos 34, Saints 14
NINERS
AT CARDINALS Yes they’re freeeeeeeee (dah dahdahdahdah dah dah dah)
they’re free faaaaaallin. I’ll take the Niners on Monday Night and me to
keep dropping that same Tom Petty reference until the Cards win a game.
If you haven’t already gotten tired of me, wait till we get to Week 13
and I’m still quoting “Free Fallin.” W Niners 24, Cardinals 3
WEEK 9
THE SAME OLD JETS
Remember how I said that I was kinda, sorta, maybe back in on the
Jets? Yeah, I’m now running away from that statement. Funny how I can do
a complete 180 on my favorite team, but I am.
Maybe it’s an overreaction. After all, the Jets didn’t play
especially badly against the Dolphins. They averaged five yards per
carry. They ran twenty more total plays than the Dolphins did. The Jets
either led or were not far behind in every statistical category except
for the most important one. The scoreboard. At the end of the game, it
read, “Dolphins 30, Jets 9.”
Every single thing that had been a problem for the Jets throughout
this season and the end of 2011 found ways to manifest themselves in
this one. Was there shaky special teams? You bet! How about a blocked
punt to put the Jets down 10-0 and set the tone for the rest of the
game? Oh, and a missed field goal before the half that could have made
the score 20-3 and given the Jets some momentum. Don’t forget about that
one. Plus they were caught off guard by an onside kick. How about bad
pass blocking? Well, the Jets aim to please! Four sacks for a total of
twenty-five yards lost was enough to set the already anemic Jet offense
back even further. The Jets’ O-Line especially had trouble with
recognizing corner blitzes and various stunts, repeatedly letting
cornerback Jimmy Wilson get into the backfield. On the play that really
swung the game in the Dolphins’ favor, Wilson came unblocked from
Sanchez’s blind side around left tackle D’Brickashaw Ferguson, who never
recognized his assignment. Wilson then punched the ball out of
Sanchez’s hands and into the hands of defensive tackle Koa Misi to set
the Dolphins up inside the Jet 35. Shaky play-calling? Yeah, we had some
of that too. There is no circumstance whatsoever where Sanchez should
be throwing a football 54 times in a game. It could be a playoff game,
regular season game, Sanchez family touch football game, whatever.
There’s just no reason why it should ever happen. And that’s especially
true when the running game is picking up five yards per carry. Why even
put the ball in Mark Sanchez’s hands that much? Oh, and last but not
least, there’s Sanchez himself. You know, he of the 12.1 QBR. According
to ESPN Stats and Information, 14 of Sanchez’s 54 passes were either
overthrown or underthrown. Coming into this game, Sanchez had either
over or underthrown 23.4% of his passes, which is by far the most in the
league. Wow, I didn’t think I could feel worse about Sanchez than I did
six hours ago when I watched him. I’m actually beginning to wonder if
Sanchez has a depth perception problem. Go back and watch his
interception to Alfonzo Dennard against the Pats. He had Steven Hill
wide open on a go route in the end zone about twenty yards downfield,
and then he threw one of the most horrific passes I’ve ever seen in my
life. It seemed to hang in the air forever before Dennard intercepted it
five yards short of where Hill was. A Hail Mary crossed with a five
year old kid releasing a balloon into the sky was the best way to
describe it . And yet Tony Sparano decided, “Hey, let’s have him throw
the ball 54 times today and completely ignore our running game.” Savvy
move, Tony. I can’t believe I picked the Jets.
Of
course, the Jets did plenty of talking in the week leading up to the
game. Antonio Cromartie called Reggie Bush a “punk.” Chaz Schilens
called them “cheap.” And Rex Ryan said before their first matchup with
the Dolphins that the Jets wanted to, “put some hot sauce on Reggie
Bush”, which sounds more along the lines of cannibalism than trash talk.
My point is; enough with this crap. The Ryan era came with the promise
of eliminating the so-called “same old Jets.” For the 2009 and 2010
seasons, we were the new and improved Jets that backed up our talk and
played with a brash swagger that nobody else in the league had. And
then, it changed. These are precisely the same old Jets. They’re
pretenders that can’t beat good teams or play their best when they need
to. I’m another disappointing year away from saying that it’s time to
clean house. The Jets are not run by Rex Ryan, Tony Sparano, Mike
Tannenbaum, or Woody Johnson right now. They are instead run by
delusion. Delusion that Mark Sanchez and/or Tim Tebow is the long term
answer at quarterback. Delusion that the Ground and Pound Jets are alive
and well despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. And delusion
that they can contend for the next five to seven years with their
current roster. I can see the writing on the wall for the rest of the
Jets’ season pretty clearly. A punchless loss to Seattle after the bye.
Another disappointing home loss to New England. A bunch of meaningless
blowout wins against patsies like Jacksonville and Tennessee to get
people’s hopes up. And then a final letdown against Buffalo on the last
day to drop those hopes off the Empire State Building. This is just how
the Same Old Jets operate. With the corners and the O-Line as the only
above average parts of the team, it’s time for management to shift into
rebuilding mode. Remember when I described what the worst place in
sports was? When you’re not a contender, but you’re good enough to not
bottom out? Well, that’s where the Jets are, only pile on a few
expensive contracts and an incompetent front office on top of that.
Unless Mike Tannenbaum makes some savvy moves (really unlikely) or Jets
fans conspire to frame Mark Sanchez for a crime, then that perpetual
state of mediocrity will be ensured for another few years. Just another
day in the life of the Same Old Jets.
THE NFC
So
what about the NFC Playoff picture? We already went over the AFC; it’s
essentially a logjam that’s going to take a couple weeks to clear. But
the NFC, the clearly superior conference, seems to also have no shortage
of teams that could potentially sneak into the playoffs. Let’s run down
the divisions.
East-
The Giants are already running away with this division. But don’t let
that fool you, the Giants are not as good as their 6-2 record would
indicate. Again, I hate playing the “what if” game because that can be
said about literally every single play in every single game. However,
it’s not exactly a big leap to suggest that the G-Men should be 4-4
right now. If Dez Bryant’s hand were a half inch closer to his body when
he landed in the endzone this past Sunday, they would have lost to the
Cowboys. And if Madieu Williams isn’t an absentee landlord in his
coverage against Victor Cruz, that’s potentially another loss against a
divisional opponent. Time
Out: If you got the hidden Pacino reference there, then give me a high
five. Unless you’re in a public place and high fiving a book would make
you look weird. Then just wait until you get home. That
would make them 1-3 in the division and in just about the worst spot
out of anybody in the East. Both Antrel Rolle and Chase Blackburn have
gotten hurt, and their capacity to cover tight ends and possession
receivers was bad enough before that.The Cowboys were able to stay in
the game down the stretch because Romo kept throwing eight yard out
routes and underneath curls to Witten, who finished the day with
eighteen catches for 167 yards. So even though the Giants have the
division locked up, they’re not necessarily as good as you might think. Time Out: A-ha! Finally nailed a big prediction!
North-
This one seems like a two team race between the Bears and the Packers.
It seems a little bit too close to call right now. I was sold on the
Packers before the season started, but then they started playing very
inconsistently. I wrote a couple weeks back that teams had started to
figure them out. It was the Bears’ division to lose. And so far, they
haven’t lost it. However, their team is looking a little bit like the
2011 Lions in the respect that they’ve had more defensive touchdowns
than is realistic to ever expect to have again. With a defense that
good, turnovers are always going to be an advantage. However, turnovers
returned for touchdowns are just about the most random thing in
football. The Bears have also had the good fortune of playing some
pretty bad teams. They’ve gotten the Panthers (23rd in DVOA), the Colts
(28th), the Jaguars (30th), and the Cowboys on one of Tony Romo’s
terrible games. That’s not exactly a murderer’s row of offense. And they
almost lost to Carolina, to boot. Meanwhile, the Packers seem like they
are finding their groove in the midst of a three game winning streak.
Ever since I wrote my, “What’s wrong with the Packers?” section, they’ve
outscored opponents 96-59 over their last three games. If you give them
the win in the Seattle Screw game (and I do because I felt like I
needed to have a “IT’S MY BOOK AND I CAN DO WHAT I WANT!” moment. Feels
great.), that would only put them a half game behind the Bears for the
division lead. On the other hand, the Packers’ defense is pretty banged
up, especially at the inside linebacker position. I expected this to be
Desmond Bishop’s breakout year, but he’s out with a season ending
injury. Backup linebacker D.J. Smith had been filling in for Bishop
extremely well, but now he’s out. And on top of all of that, it was in
question for most of the game whether they would beat the Jaguars. The
only thing that I can be sure about is that this is a two team race,
since the Lions are three games back and the Vikings are pretty much
done after their no-show against Tampa. I’m still sticking with my
preseason pick and going with the Packers.
South-
The Falcons have this division locked up. They’re three games up on
their closest competitor, the Bucs, and will probably win the division
by the beginning of December.
West-
Same goes for the Niners, who have a two game lead over both the
Seahawks and the Cardinals. They’ve also beaten both of those teams and
hold a perfect divisional record so far. This one is already locked up
as well.
Wild
Card- Just like the AFC playoff picture, this one is going to be
interesting. If the playoffs started today, the Vikings and the Packers
would get the Wild Card spots. However, no less than TEN teams (Packers,
Vikings, Eagles, Redskins, Cowboys, Rams, Cardinals, Seahawks, Bucs,
and Lions) are within two games of those Wild Card spots as of today.
And that’s assuming none of the division leaders collapse and lose their
lead. Right away, I think I see some teams that I can eliminate. The
Eagles, for instance, are pretty safe bets to miss the playoffs because
of reasons that I’ve already spent thousands of words on. The Redskins
are another team that has no identifiable strengths except for RG3 and
Alfred Morris. Their defense has looked terrible for two straight weeks,
and it’s pretty safe to assume that they’re not going to get better as
the season moves along. Time Out: OK, so I’m 1-2 for the last two pages. Ultimately,
I’d give the two remaining Wild Card spots to the Seahawks and the
Bears (because I think that the Packers are going to win the division).
Look at that list up there and try to pick out two other teams that have
strong identities. Teams that don’t know what they do best, such as the
Rams or the Cowboys, aren’t going to last very long when push comes to
shove. Trust a Jets fan on that one. Maybe you can make the case that
the Lions have as much as talent as the Seahawks and Bears, but they’re
going to need a heck of a second half surge to pull themselves out of a
3-4 start. Out of the 19 wins that Matt Stafford has had in his career,
eight of them came with the Lions trailing at the beginning of the
fourth quarter. All three of the Lions’ wins this year have also come
under those circumstances. I don’t put much faith in teams that
consistently require a fourth quarter comeback to win a whole lot of
games. The Seahawks and Bears both have great defenses that can
consistently measure up to any team in the league. Both teams can
dominate the lines of scrimmage on the offensive and defensive sides of
the ball like nobody else on that list can. The only thing that the
Bears and Seahawks can’t do is play from behind. The less that the ball
is in the hands of Russell Wilson/Jay Cutler, the better. Both the
Seahawks and the Bears have figured out ways to win without explosive
passing games, and that’s what will make the difference in the inclement
weather that December will often bring. That’s why they’re my picks to
take the two remaining spots in the NFC.
- Demaryius Thomas has taken the sage advice of Bill Simmons’ readers and dressed up as a replacement ref for Halloween. Is that the greatest Halloween costume idea of all time? Possibly, right? It was funny and all, but I feel like it was a little bit of a dumb move when he knows that Police Chief Goodell is watching and probably planning his arrest.
- This past Sunday’s Giants-Cowboys game was just another classic moment in the Cowboys’ never ending quest to find new and inventive ways to sucker punch their fans. They allow twenty-three unanswered points to the Giants in the first half, compliments of three horrible turnovers. Then, the Cowboys go on a tear and score twenty-four unanswered points to make the score 24-23, Dallas. Then, the Giants end up tacking on two more field goals to put them up 29-24 with about four minutes left to play. One of those field goals came as a result of an indefensible fumble by Felix Jones where he ran into his own offensive lineman. Time Out: This was the spiritual grandfather of the Mark Sanchez butt fumble that was to occur one month later. The Cowboys end up driving down the field, because of the Giants’ inability to cover Jason Witten’s out route. The Boys end up facing second and one at the Giants’ 19, and then somehow they fail to pick up that one yard on second or third downs. On fourth down, the offensive line completely fails to block anybody, letting Jason Pierre-Paul and Linval Joseph have a straight shot at Tony Romo, who throws a desperation pass that gets intercepted. The Cowboys get the ball back at their own thirty with forty-four seconds left and start driving down the field again. The ball is at the Giants’ 37 with mere ticks left in the game when Romo flings a pass to the end zone that’s CAUGHT BY DEZ BRYANT!!!!!! TOUCHDOWN COWBOYS!!!!! THE COWBOYS HAVE PULLED OFF A MIRAC- nope. When Dez Bryant cushioned his fall after a terrific leaping catch in the back of the end zone, one finger on the hand that hit the ground first was out of bounds. Rich Eisen observed that if he had put his fist down instead of his hand, the Cowboys would have won. Romo’s remaining attempts would fall incomplete and the Giants escape with a 29-24 win. In light of everything that’s happened, the Cowboys’ logo needs to be changed to one of those Internet troll masks wrapped around the blue star. It’s time.
- I’ll take the Chargers over the Chiefs in this one. But in a way, a blowout win would be pretty bad for the Chargers because the front office staff couldn’t justify firing Norv Turner immediately after that. They had a golden chance to do it after the Chargers lost to the Browns this week and they blew it. As a quick aside, did you know that Chargers’ GM A.J. Smith’s nickname among his critics is the Lord of No Rings? Can I continue to make you feel worse about the Chargers, or should I just stop now? W Chargers 31, Chiefs 13
- That was one heck of a statement game from the Patriots. Every once in awhile, usually after one or two tough losses, the Brady-era Pats have a statement game. I call them statement games because it’s as though they’re telling the rest of the league, “Screw you; we’re the Patriots and you’re not.” Now, the Patriots are supposed to win, and they often do. But these kinds of games go beyond winning; instead they’re utter dominations. That’s why the Pats are still one of the best teams in the league; because of their collective ability to tell an inferior opponent, “You know what? You’re losing 45-7 today. There’s nothing you can do about it.” If the Brady era Pats are ever coming off of a tough loss or two, you could pencil them in for a blowout win in the next game.
WEEK 9 PICKS: 11-1-12
BRONCOS
AT BENGALS Hey, it’s the Gus Johnson Bowl! Remember Brandon Stokley’s
Immaculate Deflection catch back in 2009? Good times. However, it’s
decidedly not good times for the Cincinnati Bengals. They rank 28th in
defensive DVOA and 26th in overall DVOA. Opponents have been able to put
up thirty points or more in four of the Bengals’ seven games, and
facing Peyton Manning does nothing to help the problem. I’ll take the
Broncos on the road. W Broncos 31, Bengals 23
RAVENS
AT BROWNS This is another game where I thought about an upset before
deciding against it. The Ravens looked terrible without Webb and Lewis
on defense, and divisional games are always going to be close. But the
Ravens had two weeks to settle their “who’s our new play caller on
defense?” issue, and I doubt that they’ll play as badly as they did
against a vastly better Texans team. To pick the Browns in this game
would also mean going with Brandon Weeden over a quality team, and
that’s a forty foot freefall off of a cliff (I thought “Leap of Faith”
would be too generous) that I’m unwilling to take. I’ll go with the
Ravens by a field goal. W Ravens 25, Browns 15
CARDINALS
AT PACKERS Gonna freeeeee faaaaaaall, out into nothing. Gonna leaaaaave
thiiiiiis, world for a while. AND I’M FREEEEEEE.... Isn’t this a fun
gimmick? I’ll take the Packers in this one because there’s no way a
defense that only forced one incompletion
out of Alex Smith is going to do anything against Aaron Rodgers.
Packers win in a blowout to extend their winning streak to four, while
the Cardinals’ losing streak hits five. W Packers 31, Cardinals 17
BEARS
AT TITANS OK, so maybe the Bears weren’t as good as I thought they
were. Again, the six defensive touchdowns in four games (completely
unsustainable) probably go a long way towards inflating the Bears’
stock. But even so, there is absolutely no reason why the Bears should
lose to the Titans. Nobody stops the run better than the Bears (77.9
yards per game allowed, best in the league), and there are few running
backs that are streakier than Chris Johnson. It won’t be difficult for
the Bears to make the Titans one dimensional, and that one dimension
(One Dimension: not a bad name for a One Direction cover band, but I
digress) is Matt Hasselbeck. I rest my case. Bears win by ten points. W Bears 51, Titans 20
PANTHERS
AT REDSKINS The Panthers are just a team in complete disarray right now
after the firing of GM Marty Hurney. With all of the bad contracts left
over from the Hurney era (Charles Johnson for twelve million per year,
for instance), the Panthers are just about trapped cap-wise for a year
or two. Meanwhile, it’s fair to say that Cam Newton is taking steps
backward in his maturation as a rookie QB because Ron Rivera is
increasingly yanking the offense away from Newton and giving it to the
Williams-Stewart backfield. Ever since Carolina was beaten down by the
Giants, there’s been a dramatic reduction in the number of read option
plays run and increase in traditional power running schemes. The change
has not been a welcome one for the Panthers, who have seen their
offensive production slide even more since the shift. Because of
Carolina’s self-inflicted hampering of their offense, I’ll take the
Redskins to get back on track with a 28-13 win. L Panthers 21, Redskins 13
LIONS AT JAGUARS The Lions win. *yawn* Next. W Lions 31, Jaguars 14
DOLPHINS
AT COLTS If the Colts had only switched to a prevent defense against
the Jaguars in Week 2, there’s a possibility that they could be gunning
for a 6-2 record right now. That’s mildly unbelievable. But one thing
that the Colts haven’t done well this year is stop the run and prevent
running backs from getting to the second level. They currently rank 27th
in the league in rushing yards allowed per game, and the Dolphins’
excellent offensive line won’t help that problem. I’ll take the
Dolphins: 24-13. L Colts 23, Dolphins 20
BILLS
AT TEXANS Only thing of note in this game is Mario Williams’ return
home to Houston. After a beating by the Texans, he’ll be begging to
stay. I’ll go with the Texans by at least twenty. W Texans 21, Bills 9
BUCS
AT RAIDERS Upset pick! I’m jumping on Oakland’s bandwagon for this one
because of the East/West time zone shift. Besides, there’s absolutely no
way a team as inconsistent as the Bucs can string together two great
games in a row. Oakland wins 27-23 and gets back to .500. L Bucs 42, Raiders 32
VIKINGS
AT SEAHAWKS I think the Vikes might have a little bit of the 2012
Cardinals’ DNA in them. I really don’t like their chances of facing the
Seahawks on the road with a young QB and coming out with a win. And
after seeing what Doug Martin did to the Vikes last week (or more
accurately, what the Vikes let Doug Martin do to them. A lot of
defenders were out of position all day, especially on that screen pass
Martin scored on), it’s hard for me to imagine they’ll turn it around
when they face Marshawn Lynch. I’ll take the Seahawks to win and get
over .500. W Seahawks 30, Vikings 20
STEELERS
AT GIANTS I feel like the Giants are going to win this one for two
reasons that go beyond the game. First of all, the Steelers are
traveling the same day as the game because of Hurricane Sandy. How can
that possibly work out well? Secondly, remember what I said about teams
raising their level of play when tragedies happen? I feel like that’s
what will happen with the Giants this weekend. It’s no different from
when the Jets played the Sunday Night game against Dallas on the tenth
anniversary of 9/11 or when the Giants blanked the Redskins after owner
Wellington Mara’s death. I’ll take the Giants to win for those two
reasons. And of course, my thoughts and prayers go out to all of the
people who suffered losses of either life or property during Hurricane
Sandy. The Jersey Shore (the real one, not the one that MTV would have
you believe) has always had fond memories for me, and I look forward to
the day when everything is back to normal down there. L Steelers 24, Giants 20
COWBOYS
AT FALCONS UPSET!! That’s right, the Atlanta Falcons are going to be
knocked off by the Dallas Cowboys. I feel like the Cowboys started to
gain a lot of momentum against the Giants in the second half. And
despite what the point totals show, Rob Ryan’s defense did a fantastic
job of stopping the G-Men. Manning’s long completion to Reuben Randle
was the only real offense the Giants could generate all day. The rest of
the points were mostly the result of good field position after
turnovers, such as the touchdown scored after Dez Bryant’s muffed punt.
I’m really a big fan of the Cowboys’ corners, Brandon Carr and Morris
Claiborne. They’re one of the few CB duos in the league that can match
Roddy White and Julio Jones play for play. Meanwhile, those near losses
to the Panthers and Raiders give me the impression that the Falcons
might not be as good as their record indicates. And with pseudo-elite
teams, there’s usually at least one big letdown game. Look at the 2008
Titans, for instance. They were undefeated despite a few close calls
against bad teams, and they ended up being fleeced by the Jets on their
own turf in Week 12. They’re a different team than the 2012 Falcons, but
I believe that the situations are similar. I’ll take the Boys in a
33-25 upset win. L Falcons 19, Cowboys 13
EAGLES
AT SAINTS It’s the Misery Bowl, coming to you live on ESPN!! For the
first time this season, the Saints offense looked pretty miserable
against a pedestrian Broncos’ secondary. But even if the Saints’ offense
were firing on all cylinders, it would need to be downright historic to
keep pace with the abominable defense. They’ve given up at least 400
yards of total offense in seven straight games, a dubious distinction
that only they can claim. And for a desperate Eagles team that’s one
loss away from the end of the Reid/Vick era, this is undoubtedly a team
that they want to play right now. I’ll take the Eagles, 37-24. L Saints 28, Eagles 13
WEEK 10
MORE MIDSEASON AWARDS
MVP- I probably got too cute with my RG3 for MVP pick. I’m going to
correct that and instead go with Matt Ryan. Picking the quarterback of
the league’s only undefeated team is daring, I know. But it seems like
the only smart pick right now. He has completed over 60% of his passes
in every game so far and ranks in the top five in nearly every major
statistical category (completion percentage, touchdowns, and QBR, to
name a few). Besides, the MVP award often boils down to the best player
on the best team. I usually go against that trend and instead choose the
player that has made the biggest impact on his team’s performance
(hence the RG3 pick), but there are no other fantastic candidates for
MVP that I can see right now. The runner-up for the MVP trophy is
probably Peyton Manning because he’s a big name that has made a huge
impact on a team above .500. Manning probably won’t win the MVP award
because of the dumb “he’s already won it four times, somebody else needs
to win it” unwritten rule. But if Denver can reel off six or seven wins
in a row over the second half of the year, which isn’t out of the
question, Manning’s MVP stock is gonna go through the roof. I tried to
talk myself into picking J.J. Watt, but I couldn’t do it. We would need
to see a transcendent season from a once in a lifetime defensive player
for that discussion to take place. And while I do believe Watt can get
there, he’s not quite there yet.
Defensive
MVP- J.J. Watt, meet the NFL defensive MVP trophy. You two will be
getting very well acquainted over the next ten years or so. A whole lot
of offenses have started to take notice of Watt’s play and say, “I think
we might want to double team or chip block that guy. Might be a good
idea.” As a result, Watt is no longer on pace for a record breaking
number of sacks. However, he has 10.5 of them through eight games, which
is good enough for the league lead in that category. He is now on pace
for 21 sacks, which would make him the youngest player to ever break the
20 single season sacks barrier. What makes this all doubly impressive
is that Watt accomplishes all of this while being a defensive end in a
3-4 scheme. In a 3-4, the outside linebackers are typically the big pass
rushers. A 3-4 defensive end’s typical job is to occupy blockers and
stunt to the outside linebacker position if need be. The fact that Watt
is able to lead the league in sacks from this role is nothing short of
incredible. Wade Phillips does tend to play more of an aggressive 5-2
defense instead of a base 3-4 formation, but that makes it no less
impressive. I had to search the Internet for about ten minutes before I
was able to find the 3-4 defensive end that had the second most sacks at
this point in the season. It’s Watt’s teammate, Antonio Smith, with
four of them. Notice the disparity. And I’d be willing to bet that some
of those opportunities were created because offensive lines had to slide
protection over to Watt’s side of the field. Of course, J.J. Watt’s
pass swatting skills make it almost like having another linebacker on
the field. He has defended ten passes this year, at least four more than
any other defensive end and good enough for eighth on the league list
in passes defended. And this is for a player that is never actually
assigned to cover a wide receiver. I couldn’t find stats for how many of
those tipped passes have turned into interceptions, but I can remember
at least two of them did. If I can’t effectively convince you that J.J.
Watt is the best defensive player in football, then I really need to
stop writing this book and study for my Italian quiz. Crap, I should
probably do that anyways.
Best Game- Week Five, Packers-Colts has got to be the best game this year for these five reasons.
Chuck
Pagano was diagnosed with leukemia earlier that week, and that added a
lot of emotional weight to the game for the Colts. If I hear even one
player on a team say, “We have to win this one for (insert person
here)”, I know that some crazy stuff is bound to happen in that game.
You never have a “we have to win this one for (insert person here)” game
end up 6-3 with twenty combined penalties. It just doesn’t happen.
If
the Colts end up making the playoffs (which would be beyond impressive
considering their pre-season projections), then this is the game that
started it all. The whole Chuck Pagano story was simultaneously sad and
inspiring to so many people, including the entire Colts team. After the
second half of that game started, you could just feel something
fundamentally change about that team. It’s not often that you get to
observe a season being transformed in minutes like that.
In
a lot of comebacks like this, the team that was up initially usually
caves to some degree. But that didn’t happen here. The Pack definitely
played well. The only thing that ended up killing them was penalties (9
of them for 89 yards), but the Colts also had them (9 for 100 yards).
Green Bay scored touchdowns on all three of their red zone trips, only
committed one turnover, and was able to run the ball effectively (6.2
yards per carry). The Colts just played a fantastic game, and that’s why
they won.
It
marked the real beginning of the Andrew Luck era. It technically began
at the start of the season, but he was pretty quiet for the first few
weeks. That’s not to say he was bad, of course, but rookie QBs always
have a 4-5 week grace period where they run a simplified offense and are
heavily managed by the offensive coordinator. If it’s not part of the
coaches’ plan, it certainly feels and looks like it. This is the game
where Luck shed his training wheels. The Colts were down 21-3 when Bruce
Arians probably decided, “We don’t have much of a shot of coming back,
so why not let Luck take some risks?” Luck then led them all the way
back, and Arians did the smart thing by letting Luck keep taking shots,
as opposed to the annoying “Down by three, on the opponent’s 12 yard
line, third and seven, run the draw play” mentality. (Pat Shurmur™)
It
was a comeback. Who doesn’t love comebacks? At that point in the
season, the Colts were thought to be one of the worst teams in the
league. In the first half, the Packers seemed to be getting their mojo
back. Everybody was thinking, “OK, this game is completely over. The
Pack are back.” (switching to Lee Corso voice)... NOT so FAST my
FRIEND!!!! The Colts came all the way back, won 30-27, and capped off
the year’s greatest game...... so far.
ODDS AND DEFENSIVE ENDS: WEEK 10
- So where does Doug Martin’s 251 yard, four touchdown performance put him in the rankings for best running back in the league? Probably not in the top five just yet: those spots belong to McCoy, Foster, Rice, Peterson, and Jones-Drew. But I think it’s perfectly reasonable to put him in the top 10. After all, he’s already there in yards, yards per carry, touchdowns, and yards per game. I’m not putting him past Marshawn Lynch and Stevan Ridley just yet, but I’ll put him just ahead of Frank Gore and Jamaal Charles. Halfway through Doug Martin’s rookie season, it’s not unreasonable to put him in the top 10. Wow, I can’t believe I just said that. Quite a change from “larger sample size needed”, no? By the way, don’t take that as an expert opinion. Martinmania has left its mark on me. Only took one game.
- Even though it didn’t get as much attention as the hit that gave him a concussion, RG3 made another reckless choice this Sunday. The Skins were down to the Panthers 21-6 when RG3 converted a fourth and four by allowing himself to get sandwiched in between two defenders, who sent him spinning in the air (a la John Elway) and over the marker. It didn’t injure him, but it very well could have. Washington not only had just about no chance of winning, but RG could have also picked up the first down by diving for it instead of taking on two linebackers. He’s gotta be less reckless.
- I’m not saying that Beyonce for the Super Bowl Halftime Show is a downgrade from The Who or Bruce Springsteen but...... scratch that, it is kind of a downgrade from The Who or Bruce Springsteen. If this book is even moderately successful, I’m using all of my powers to get Bruce back for the 2014 show in the Meadowlands. You know it needs to happen.
- Wow, the Colts have been playing well lately. Like, unusually well. Plus, they’re 5-1 in close games this year. Hmmmm..... It looks like everybody’s jumping on the Colts’ bandwagon even though they seem to be outplaying their collective talent (no semblance of control up front whatsoever). And we all know that road teams have a tendency to look terrible on Thursday Nights because of the whole short week+travel thing. This smells like a trap game to me. For once, I’m not falling for it. I’ll take Jacksonville over Indy, 23-13. L Colts 27, Jaguars 10
· WEEK 10 PICKS: 10/6/12
GIANTS
AT BENGALS I had been saying that the Giants were due for a letdown
game for weeks now, so of course it happens on the one game in that
stretch where I pick them. But one team that I am pretty down on this
year is the Cincinnati Bengals. They’re an average team that masqueraded
as an above average team in 2011 due to an easy schedule. That’s a
luxury they don’t have in 2012, and their performance has reflected it.
Besides, the Giants usually don’t play two crappy games in a row. I like
New York in this one, 35-24. L Bengals 31, Giants 13
TITANS
AT DOLPHINS Despite last week’s loss, I’m still in on the Dolphins.
They do have an outstandingly bad pass defense, but that shouldn’t be a
huge problem against the Titans. In fact, I probably didn’t even need to
see the Titans’ opponent. As soon as I see “Titans at”, I’m going
against them. Wow, they’ve looked helpless this year. Out of their six
losses, five of them have come by twenty points or more. How is this
team 3-6 again? I wish I knew. But I do know that the Dolphins are going
to roll over the Titans by at least two touchdowns. L Titans 37, Dolphins 3
LIONS
AT VIKINGS I feel like the Lions are starting to climb back from the
brink. Key wins over Philly and Seattle have Detriot back in the playoff
hunt. One of the losses that put the Lions on the brink was to none
other than the Minnesota Vikings. The Lions lost that game by one
touchdown and the Vikings got two special teams touchdowns. That’s not
likely to happen again. This will probably be a close game until the
end, but the Lions should put it away with a final touchdown drive and
win 34-24. L Vikings 34, Lions 24
BILLS
AT PATRIOTS The Pats have not lost a home game that immediately follows
their bye week since 2002. Against the porous Buffalo Bills’ defense,
that streak is in no danger of ending. Pats win by a score of 41-17. W Patriots 37, Bills 31
CHARGERS
AT BUCS I want to avoid hopping on the Bucs’ bandwagon simply because
they’ve looked a little bit too good the past few weeks. Whenever you
see a huge spike in a team’s performance compared to everything they had
done previous to that, it should be treated with suspicion. However,
picking against the Bucs would mean pinning my hopes on a “should have
been fired” Norv Turner. You know what? I’m gonna do it. The Chargers
have the fourth ranked run defense in the league, and the Bucs are on
the second leg of their West Coast road trip. Plus, Tampa’s O-Line is
clearly exceeding expectations without Carl Nicks and Davin Joseph. I’m
thinking it’s relapse time for the Bucs. L Bucs 34, Chargers 24
FALCONS
AT SAINTS Remember when I thought I had a good handle on the New
Orleans Saints? Good times. However, I can’t feel good about picking the
Saints here. That atrocious performance on all fronts in Denver is
still fresh in my mind. Sure, they looked good against the Eagles. But
don’t forget about Patrick Robinson’s 99 yard interception return. It
eliminated the possibility of the Eagles getting a touchdown on that
drive (which they were about to do) and instead put one on the board for
the Saints. So if that never happened (let’s just say the tipped pass
went away from Robinson instead of right at him), then the score is
21-16 or even 21-20. That’s not so impressive anymore, right? Especially
when they were at home and against an Eagles team that is coming apart
at the seams. Atlanta should stay undefeated for another week. L Saints 31, Falcons 27
RAIDERS
AT RAVENS The player that Doug Martin gets compared to most often is
Ray Rice. Doug Martin ran for almost 250 yards against the Raiders last
week. Ray Rice plays professional football for the Baltimore Ravens.
Yep, I think I’m going with Baltimore here. W Ravens 55, Raiders 20
JETS
AT SEAHAWKS Did you know that Russell Wilson has yet to throw an
interception at home (cough, cough)? Or that the Seahawks are 4-0 at
home this year? They’re just a dominant team at home, and that has a lot
to do with their ability to win the battles up front. Even though the
“running to set up the pass” notion is somewhat outdated in the NFL, the
Seahawks need to do it to set up Russell Wilson’s play action passing.
It’s something that they’ve been doing to great effect, as Marshawn
Lynch has averaged 4.8 yards per carry. Fortunately for Seattle, that’s
the exact way to beat the Jets. Dominate them at the line, and then
blitz Sanchez until the cows come home. I’ll take Seattle by 10. W Seahawks 28, Jets 7
BRONCOS
AT PANTHERS Future generations are going to look back at this game and
recognize that it was the start of my best prediction ever’s journey to
coming true. Time Out: Buy the book for details.
I’ll take Peyton Manning throwing against Josh Norman and Haruki
Nakamura all day. Anybody that plays the Panthers should adopt the same
offensive strategy that teams use against the Patriots- just throw the
ball thirty yards downfield at least three or four times per quarter and
trust that something good will happen. The Panthers won’t be able to
bully the Broncos’ front like they were able to with Washington. I’ll
take the Broncos, 27-13. W Broncos 36, Panthers 14
COWBOYS
AT EAGLES The Cowboys have to come through one of these weeks. Three
very winnable games (Ravens, Giants, Falcons) have all ended up adding
an L to the Cowboys’ schedule. This is absolutely ridiculous. I’m going
to break one of my most tried and true rules, which is to never fall
into the Gambler’s Fallacy Trap. I am going to assume that Dallas won’t
blow another winnable game even though the probability of the Cowboys
blowing another game hasn’t changed. They’re just too good of a team to
be 3-6, and that description does not fit a decomposing Eagles team with
a lame duck head coach. I’ll take Dallas, 23-20. W Cowboys 38, Eagles 23
RAMS
AT NINERS St Louis in San Fran after a bye? This game won’t exactly be
yanking my attention away from the Jets. San Fran should win in a
blowout. W (I’m counting the tie) Niners 24, Rams 24
CHIEFS
AT STEELERS Pittsburgh has won three straight games and it should
probably be five straight games. They’re starting to gain a lot of
momentum. On the other hand, Kansas City wouldn’t know momentum if it
came up and punched them in the mouth. Come to think of it, that’s kind
of what’s going to happen in this one. Steelers in a blowout. W Steelers 16, Chiefs 13 (OT)
TEXANS
AT BEARS Ohhhhhhhh man. This is gonna be the game of the year, and the
winner will probably be the NFL’s undisputed best team after the week is
over. I’ve jumped on the Texans’ bandwagon all year, and I’m not
getting off now. The Bears’ amazing defensive touchdown streak has
obscured a very important fact about them. Their offense is terrible.
It’s 25th in total DVOA at 36.5% worse than the average offense. That’s
probably the worst ever recorded for a team that’s doing as well as the
Bears are right now. Chicago also ranks dead last in adjusted sack rate,
which is just like regular sack rate except it’s adjusted for down,
distance, and opponent. Oh, and Jay Cutler gets sacked on somewhere
around 10.5% of his dropbacks. Also, due to Football Outsiders’
statistics on sacks allowed and most false start penalties, I have come
to the conclusion that JaMarcus Webb might be the worst tackle in
football. You know who he’s facing this Sunday? J.J. Watt! Yep, the same
J.J. Watt that leads the league in sacks right now. If Houston just
takes care of the football (they have six turnovers committed all year,
the least in the league), they should be able to deal with the Bears.
Basically, as long as the Texans’ offense denies the Bears’ defense a
chance to make that game-changing turnover, they’ll win. I’m taking
Houston, 16-10. W Texans 13, Bears 6
No comments:
Post a Comment